Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Historic Cabinet Meeting

The Nepalese government held a historic cabinet meeting at Kala Patthar, 5200m, near Everest Base camp. Its purpose was to draw world attention on the effects of climate change in the Himalayas before the Copenhagen Summit.

I think this meeting provided the much-needed world attention on the problems on developing nations as a result of climate change. It was also a call for developed nations to aid developing nations that bear equal, if not more, effect of climate change for green house gases released in the atmosphere disproportionately by countries. Hence, it becomes a world responsibility to help countries unable to fight such radical problems through their own resources. The rapidly industrializing nations and emerging economies like China, India, Brazil and Russia should also announce drastic measures to opt for “Green Energy” for its development and prevent the future crises.

In Nepal, as usual, the critics don’t fail to argue against any act of the government. There are many other governmental activities that need criticism, but not this one. The world news media has covered the event, and it has received the required publicity to draw attention of world leaders on the effect of climate change on the Himalayas and the livelihood of regional people.

To Her

I am amazed (and equally glad) to know how much you love me. You are truly an angel. I miss you…

Him

Save Dead Languages??

I just read a blog post on the NY Times which asserted that saving dead languages is useless. He argued that if there is just one language it signifies the world coming together in this global age, and the loss of language does not mean the lost of cultures.

He may be right to some extent. A world that speaks one language maybe a sign of the world coming together, but it may also be suppression of one region. So which language do we chose? English? French? Spanish? How about million other languages? Or do we want to have a democratic election and chose the language the majority votes for?

I strongly disagree that one language may symbolize the world coming together. A world can still come together when many different languages flourish. Each language has its own beauty – some are good at emotional expression, others at poems, few at prose – and it would be insensitive of us to abolish languages so that we would have a false feeling of togetherness. And, how is it possible to be sure that many cultures aren’t tied with languages? This is not a thought out post, but rather written in whimsical distress at the blog I read few minutes ago.

Ethnic Conflict

The scene was sad. But it’s normal here. Sometime I may have been a part of that scene too. But it felt wrong: plain wrong.

The muddy road outside my house is being pitched. Finally. The construction workers hail from the southern plains of Nepal, the Tarai, and resemble to Indians in terms of their looks. And it is no surprise to many that the anti-Indian attitude has prevailed in Nepal, especially the Hilly regions, for years. The worker, who may have been around 15 at max, was shoveling the gravels off the road. A small boy, maybe 8, walks to him and says, “Terai jaa madishe” (Go back to terai). He looked amazed. Shocked at what an 8 year old was capable of saying to him. I just stood there for a minute not knowing what to do — utterly amazed at the situation. But I mildly scolded the kid and sent him away.

But this reveals the greater problems of ethnicity prevailing in Nepal. And ever since monarchy has been abolished in Nepal, the suppressed people have risen and the powerful are not yet willing to give in to the demands (sometimes, foolish ones) of these people. Many have feared that Nepal will be the next home of civil war. What happened in Iraq after Saddam’s rule may be rising in Nepal after the end of monarchy.

Let us just hope the political leaders will be able to reach a consensus and good governance will prevent a dangerous civil war from happening.

Is the threat of global warming real? A part of me can’t believe that we are still debating the issue when it’s high time we should be acting on it. Even the scientific community has reached a general consensus on the rising world temperature at a rapid rate. And we, the world citizens, have voiced our concern by popularizing Mr. Al Gore for his documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”, and the world leaders are holding conferences to reach an agreement on how to minimize the effect of global warming.

So forget the skeptics.

Recently, I happen to be at a presentation regarding the effects of climate change in Nepal. Nepal, still developing country with little industrialization, releases minimal carbon in the atmosphere. However, it is at a great risk due to global warming, especially in the mountainous region of the country. The presenter gave some very illustrative examples on how global warming is affecting rural life.

Global warming for most of us translates to rising temperature — but the effects are much more than that. Erratic snowfalls, lengthening of season at one region and the shortening of the same season at another region, higher intensity rain for shorter period of time, so forth and so on. Such erratic pattern has hindered the normal lifestyle of people in Nepal’s mountainous region. The remote villages of Manaslu and Mustang are perfect examples.

Houses in these villages have thatched roof as it snowed most of the year and the accumulation of snow kept the houses warm. But recently, the snowfalls are irregular and there have been erratic rainfalls. Therefore, it was no longer feasible for them to have thatched roof. They needed to have sloped roofs of tin. Although it seems to be a simple solution, its impact is numerous. Firstly, people in these regions are poor and people need to spend their saving to change their roofs. Also, these places are famous tourist destinations and the beautiful pattern of the houses as seen from hill-tops has been a major aspect for attracting tourists in these regions. But this beautiful pattern has been broken, as only the rich in the area have been able to change their roofs into tin-sloped ones. And believe me, if you see a picture of the place now, it doesn’t really attract many just by its scenery.

Hence, least developed country like ours need to join/form a group of countries that seem to have minimal voice in regards to global warming but are at the greatest risk. I do hope the UN conference in Copenhagen during December 2009 will bring out some much needed fruitful results.

End of war

Through a pigeon flying somewhere high
Comes a story of all dead men alive
Vague scenes from the battles won
Standing on the edge fallen apart
Still breathing Utopian dream

Puppets

Voice tells us a story of a diary.
Can’t deny the strength of the flowing river.
Water cascading down through the tiny gaps,
where the flowers of summer blossom
and smile in their own colors.

Written by the ink of black clouds,
treasured by the demon of no sin.
Where does the story end?
Did it ever have a beginning?
Beautiful mosaic, appreciated by all.
But did it have a real story to tell?

History is all that we see in the dark.
Who wrote it down for us to read?
Blindly we believe all they say;
for they can never be wrong in words.

No hopes for the voice to die out,
but whole of life left to go through.
We are the puppets for them to play,
dancing in their melodious tone.
We are the seasons they try to change
and tune us in their own way.

India and china are the two important trade centers of the world. While the economies of the two countries are skyrocketing, the muffled voices of the endangered daughters are still suppressed and confined to the four walls behind the closed doors.

“May you be the mother of hundred sons” are common blessings and good wishes bestowed to the newly wed couples. Either the one child policy opted by China or the dowry system practiced in India, without any hesitation, son preference and daughters discrimination are pre-dominant in these cultures.

In a patriarchal society, daughters are still underrepresented and undermined under the norms and values of the society. They are deprived of proper nourishments, health care, education facilities, family properties, and in extreme cases from the right to live. In the book, Endangered Daughters, Elizabeth Croll talks about the ‘missing girls.’ In China 1.05 as a benchmark ratio amounted to 50 million ‘missing women’ while in South Asia, West Asia, and North Africa the number escalated to more than 100 million.

The above data fairly reflect a vivid picture of sheer discrimination and inequality practiced against the female members of the society leading to high mortality rates. This reveals the imbalances in the sex ratio of male to female child in these societies. Not only strong son preference is continuing to get more sophisticated but also exacerbated daughter discrimination is turning more brutal and heinous.

In India and China, the socio-economic condition, cultural factors, and the rooted traditions have made women powerless and vulnerable; therefore, they are susceptible to domestic violence and all the other deprivation before and after their births. In both the settings, patriarchal family system is widely followed where a daughter is seen as somebody else’s property and son as old age support for his parents.

Before marriage a girl is a subject of her father and brother, after marriage she is a subject of her husband, and after her husband dies of her son. A woman is always expected to live under the sympathy of the male figures of her life. After marriage, a girl is given away and apparently all the responsibilities that the parents had towards their daughter end. In that sense, daughters are considered transient and are passed to her husband’s family after marriage.

As daughters are a part of her natal family until she is married, her stay there is just temporary and provisional. Since the daughters are detached from her natal family and incorporated with the husband’s family, parents of the daughters expect no returns of her upbringings and sometimes consider it as a waste. Also any contribution made by daughters is considered short-termed and perceived as unethical to depend on by these societies.

High infant mortality rate, low literacy rate, and gender inequality are the underlying factors responsible for the subordination of women in India. The traditional practice of dowry system— where a bride’s parents are expected to give material goods and cash to the groom’s family—compels the parents to willingly show their preference towards sons and discard daughters. This system highly commodifies women and causes gender-based violence accompanied by greater devaluation of daughters including rise in excessive female mortality.

As Croll states that the families, poor or rich, with the help of mid-wives practice the killing of a girl child by ending her life at birth. In that way, the family can escape the heavy cost of her upbringings, dowry, and continuing expenses even after marriage. To the contrary, sons are the constant ray of hope to the family and assurance of the continuation of the family line.

Moreover, the introduction of one-child family policy by the government of China in 1979 added further pressure on the incident of son preference and daughter devaluation. As sons carry the family name and inherit family property, having a son in the family was ever more crucial after this policy was implemented. As a result, the process of identifying the sex of the unborn child was widely practiced which increased the rate of female child abortion resulting in highly skewed male to female sex ratios in these societies.

Although the use of ultrasound to determine the sex of the unborn child was prohibited by the government, people practiced it anyways. Also, daughters cannot perform many rituals such as funeral, ancestor worship etc due to which sons are viewed as assets and daughters are excluded from the family.

“When a girl goes away to her own house, who will look after her parents if there is no son?” Such attitudes and mentality are dominant in both the Chinese and Indian cultures which give credibility and support to the social practices: son preference, infant mortality of a female, sex selective abortion, violence and prejudice against daughters.

Sons give security whereas daughters bring complexities. Hence, the expectation of return from the child reimburses the quality of rearing resulting in a poor nurturing of a girl child. As a result, daughters continue to be discriminated, as early as the time they were conceived, and women themselves seemed to be caught up in the act of under-valuing daughters.

Letter to the President

Dear President Obama,

Please invite Harry Potter to set the economy right so that we can get a job soon.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
On the bench.

You are not to be heard, it was long
decided. It’s all printed in black they say,
and carved in so deep that everyone follows.
Not just today, from the day you were born,
they called you a girl and not a boy.
You were delicate, you were fragile.
So there was always someone
—brother, father, husband, or the son—
just for you, to protect you from all evils.

There are many victims of ordinance,
robbed and raped by attackers.
But you are too intimate, they keep you
safe, miles away from the ‘domestic violence’.
You are so privileged, and yet obedient.
There can only be one captain, so you quietly
lift your dainty step and join the crew.
You don’t stand for any rights, and
you suffer no pain, encounter no injuries.
You have no visible scars or wounds to heal.
Your pious submission is served by the stronger.
Neither you think nor do you speak,
as you know, they love you silent.

You become oblivious to what you see
and insentient to things you hear.
You don’t reply to the sturdy figures
or try to persuade them. They are
just like you, deaf to your dying sound.
They are deprived and weak too.
But they are eager to protect you.
They want to feel you, know you from inside,
caress your vulnerability, and give you faith.
Security, love, and care, you get all.
They bestow you with all the happiness
—man, shelter, children, and food—
and you relish for the life time.

Older Posts »